Facebook rebranding has a fundamental problem

Changing a brand can be a strategic decision because it forces people to either ignore the difference and consider the change as evolution or withdraw from a cherished memory associated with a brand name. After introducing a new logo and appearing as ‘under construction for several weeks this year, Facebook faced that conundrum. It’s still unclear whether people accepted the change. However, Facebook is struggling for another reason: none of its features have been seamless enough to merge together without gaps. We continue to read on the internet.

The following interface we’ll use is voice. It’s not just voice when you think of digital assistants like Google Now, Alexa, or Siri. It’s also how we interact with computers nowadays, where we’re less conscious of meticulously clicking buttons than we were three years ago. Voice allows you to interact with your brand from any location. You can overtake your voice on a laptop or even at home.
What’s the problem with Facebook’s rebranding?
Facebook’s rebranding attempts to downplay how serious it can appear, but the new designs are less business-ready. If Facebook wants people to use the platform based on the type of service they provide, it must adapt its interfaces so that users can maintain a professional image. Facebook associates terms like socializing and stalking with informal settings rather than bringing in money. Even if the words are changed at some point, the implication is that Facebook does not take itself seriously. It demonstrated a willingness to be respectful because this had occurred when their original name was legal names limited to their first and last name. The emphasis now is on capturing the user’s attention so that Facebook does not become another MySpace. Before it fell out of favor with the general public, MySpace was regarded as an elite social media platform. The goal was to make it enjoyable for everyone, but people now spend far more time on Facebook than on the app. With its new name, it’s clear why people were skeptical of mass attraction.
Why might a name change be problematic?
In announcing the rebrand, Facebook’s goal was to feel more like a “modern working tool that still feels like the Facebook we all want,” In doing so, they inadvertently announced two wildly different audiences with vastly different needs: Facebook Professional and Facebook For Her. While this is absolutely necessary for opening up new markets, it is critical to recognize that this change will cause people to feel alienated. It also sets the stage for difficult conversations between Facebook and the customers it is attempting to reach.

Because there are too many ways to opt-out of being targeted, Facebook has an undue burden on its customers. People are paranoid about their online privacy, which is understandable. However, there is a balance to be struck between expecting people to self-select what information they share, tracking their browsing and device habits, and asking them to opt out of Facebook’s new model. You give permission every time you sign up for a new service or share your email address with family and friends.
Facebook’s core strategy has not changed; in fact, it may be continuing.
Facebook’s core strategy has not changed; in fact, it may be continuing. However, there is a problem: “Facebook’s core” has become what Signal and Telegram are for messaging, Snapchat for photos, Instagram for content, and Google Play Music for music. Facebook is being disassembled layer by layer by the internet itself. However, there is a problem: “Facebook’s core” has become what Signal and Telegram are for messaging, Snapchat for photos, Instagram for content, and Google Play Music for music. Facebook is being disassembled layer by layer by the internet itself.
Facebook’s core strategy has not changed; in fact, it may be continuing.
The problem is that none of those things require Facebook to be done on the internet. When Google Photos was launched, it began asking users if they wanted to upload their photos there. I’d go so far as to say that some, if not all, of the users pleading with Facebook to catch up on photo-sharing are also pleading with Google Photos. The same thing used to happen with Snapchat; for example, while Facebook made the logical decision to begin testing Facebook Suggested Posts, it never stopped providing prominent links within its newsfeed through which users could upload their photos and share them with friends. I’m sorry to use such a cliche, but it’s the battle for attention that keeps users engaged and returning to an app, and Facebook has a track record of being far ahead of the competition in this area.
Some of the drawbacks of adopting a new name
Facebook has made some progress in converting Solar # to this new branding, but they are still unsure what it means. The concept is sound: the company wants to demonstrate that it is global and extends beyond Social Media. However, Facebook’s problems stem from identifying as a company, including its mission, values, and identity. The term “Facebook” is used by people. They have recognized themselves as a social media company/brand and will fight any power that attempts to change that. Whether they liked it or not, Facebook has branded itself as a social media company as the world’s largest social media platform. They come across as focusing solely on their product.
An unintended consequence of this rebranding, a new name may allow Facebook to lean toward the free market.
Facebook is unlikely to provide any new information about the reasons for the rebranding anytime soon, but numerous theories are circulating. Some believe Facebook’s decision reflects the company’s recognition that it is no longer primarily a social media company but rather a news distribution powerhouse. According to experts, this realization prompts them to change the name because they are moving away from presenting themselves solely as a social media company.

--

--

--

I’m a growth hacker, and I can help you get the most out of your marketing strategy.

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Intelligent Life on Youtube?

The York Regional Police’s Twitter Is Hilarious

Making Nice in Cruel Times

Make Twitter great again — a guide for Elon Musk

There’s a new social media in town — Link Value Social Network

When we scroll through social media

20 Best Pixabay Images of This Winter

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Maya.T- Marketing Growth

Maya.T- Marketing Growth

I’m a growth hacker, and I can help you get the most out of your marketing strategy.

More from Medium

International Relations Between The USA and South Korea

Accounting for entrenchment to aide progress

*New Feature* ClickUp Whiteboard Review